In the midst of rising concerns over car thefts in Canada, the Flipper Zero, a popular device known for its penetration-testing capabilities, has found itself at the centre of a heated debate. Canadian officials have proposed a ban on the device, attributing it to a surge in car thefts due to its alleged ability to mimic wireless signals for remote keyless entry. However, the creators of Flipper Zero are vehemently denying these claims, stating that they are being unfairly scapegoated for the country’s car theft problem.
In a recent statement published on their website, the developers of Flipper Zero argue against the proposed ban, asserting that it would hinder technological progress and fail to address the underlying issue of car theft. They emphasise the importance of fixing vulnerabilities in security systems rather than restricting cybersecurity tools. Additionally, they highlight the limitations of Flipper Zero compared to specialised tools designed for breaking into keyless car systems, such as signal repeaters.
Alex Kulagin, the COO of Flipper Devices, has reiterated that the device cannot be used to hijack cars. He points out that signal repeaters, readily available online, pose a greater threat as they intercept signals from car key fobs, enabling remote entry and activation of vehicles. Contrary to claims made by Canadian officials, Flipper Zero lacks the computing power required for such exploits, making it a less practical choice for car thieves.
The controversy surrounding Flipper Ze
[…]
Content was cut in order to protect the source.Please visit the source for the rest of the article.