<
div class=”text-rich-text w-richtext”>
Introducing Impart + Cursor: Truly Autonomous Application Protection
Runtime Security Without the Babysitting
Security teams can now define application protection policies declaratively in Impart — with Cursor’s agent executing them safely and autonomously, eliminating the need for tedious clickops.
Why This Matters
Application protection has traditionally been a necessary burden. Security engineers find themselves trapped in a cycle of managing brittle regex rules, wrestling with unwieldy WAF interfaces, and constantly troubleshooting policy misconfigurations that disrupt production.
This manual toil isn’t just frustrating — it’s a significant business risk that drains resources and creates vulnerabilities.
Our integration with Cursor transforms this landscape by offering declarative security policies that are autonomously executed at runtime, freeing your team to focus on strategic security initiatives rather than repetitive maintenance.

Why Now Is the Time
Security teams are increasingly strained, trying to secure complex, rapidly evolving application stacks while facing:
- 61% of security teams reporting WAF configuration as one of their most significant time drains, according to a 2023 Ponemon Institute study on application security practices¹
- 78% of production incidents related to application protection stemming from human error or misconfigured rules, as reported in Verizon’s 2024 Data Breach Investigations Report²
- 92% of teams exploring AI or agentic workflows to enhance velocity without compromising security, based on Gartner’s 2024 Security & Risk Management Survey³
Impart + Cursor Agent delivers the solution these teams desperately need.
What Sets This Integration Apart
In a market saturated with automated and agentic detection tools, Impart stands alone as a comprehensive solution for automated and agentic application protection.
Impart + Cursor provides:
- ✍️ Rules-as-code DSL — human-readable, composable, and fully declarative
- 🧠 Runtime agentic e
[…]
Content was cut in order to protect the source.Please visit the source for the rest of the article.This article has been indexed from Security BoulevardRead the original article: