In a developing story that has captured public attention, General Motors (GM) finds itself embroiled in controversy amidst accusations of clandestine surveillance and unauthorised data sharing with insurance companies. The unfolding narrative, spearheaded by investigative journalist Kashmir Hill of The New York Times, sheds light on a concerning pattern of behaviour within the automotive giant, raising significant questions about privacy and consumer rights.
What Are The Practices?
Hill’s extensive investigation unveils a troubling narrative surrounding GM’s alleged surreptitious enrollment of customers into its Smart Driver program. Despite the absence of explicit consent or enrollment in OnStar services, Hill and her husband were taken aback to discover that their driving data had been discreetly shared with insurers via third-party data brokers.
Lack of Transparency
Central to the controversy are instances implicating GM dealerships in the alleged scheme, with allegations suggesting customers were unwittingly enrolled in data-sharing initiatives during vehicle purchases. The pressure purportedly exerted on dealerships by GM to achieve high enrollment rates in connected services adds a layer of complexity to the narrative.
Legal and Ethical Implications
The emergence of federal lawsuits against GM underscores the legal and ethical consequences of its data collection practices. Amidst accusations of non-disclosure and lack of transparency, concerns hav
[…]
Content was cut in order to protect the source.Please visit the source for the rest of the article.