This article has been indexed from Latest topics for ZDNet in Security
The committee probing the Surveillance Legislation Amendment (Identify and Disrupt) Bill has asked for a few amendments, such as protections around privacy, the requirement for the authorising authority to be a superior court judge, and that other law enforcement options are considered before a warrant is requested, before the Bill is passed.
Read the original article: PJCIS asks for Australia’s ‘hacking’ Bill to gain judicial oversight and sunset clauses